<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
	xmlns:hr="http://www.w3.org/2000/08/w3c-synd/#"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><channel rdf:about="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog"><title>Recent Comments for How wide should you go?</title><description>One of the first things to decide when designing a website is how wide you're going to make it. When using a fixed width (as opposed to a fluid layout) we need to decide exactly how many pixels we're going to make it. Unfortunately, like most web design techniques, it's not an exact science therefore we utter the all too familiar words of &quot;developing for the majority&quot;. We begin...</description><link>http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65</link><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/297" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/296" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/282" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/280" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/269" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/266" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/260" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/258" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/256" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/255" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/245" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/243" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/242" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/241" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/238" /></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/297">
		
		<link>http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/297</link>
		
		<title>Comment left by Sleek</title><description>Interesting and useful post. - Date posted Jul 3, 2008 09:48 AM</description><dc:date>2008-07-03T09:48:24+02:00</dc:date></item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/296">
		
		<link>http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/296</link>
		
		<title>Comment left by Sonali</title><description>Nice post. For me, it&amp;#039;s 1024x768. - Date posted Jul 3, 2008 09:45 AM</description><dc:date>2008-07-03T09:45:09+02:00</dc:date></item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/282">
		
		<link>http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/282</link>
		
		<title>Comment left by Tauranga web design</title><description>Great post, I agree with a above posts! with people moving to 1024 as a minimum now, 950 - 960 is the max, but also probably the minimum. - Date posted Apr 2, 2008 09:10 AM</description><dc:date>2008-04-02T09:10:03+02:00</dc:date></item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/280">
		
		<link>http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/280</link>
		
		<title>Comment left by New Zealand Web Design</title><description>Totally over 900 px would be ideal, i would limit it to 960px still simply because 1024 x 768 supports that nicely! - Date posted Apr 2, 2008 09:06 AM</description><dc:date>2008-04-02T09:06:29+02:00</dc:date></item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/269">
		
		<link>http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/269</link>
		
		<title>Comment left by Jason</title><description>It&amp;#039;s good to see that, finally people are becoming smarter and are converting to 1024. - Date posted Mar 11, 2008 11:36 AM</description><dc:date>2008-03-11T11:36:30+02:00</dc:date></item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/266">
		
		<link>http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/266</link>
		
		<title>Comment left by Cowhide Rug</title><description>Nice article!

I still choosing a ratio 4:3 and CRT monitors...hahaha, old skool
 - Date posted Mar 6, 2008 01:56 PM</description><dc:date>2008-03-06T13:56:20+02:00</dc:date></item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/260">
		
		<link>http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/260</link>
		
		<title>Comment left by Web Designer Group</title><description>Great tips. thanks. I think the most suitable resulution is 900 or above, bcoz, the fact, more and more users are increasing their screen resolution. - Date posted Feb 14, 2008 06:27 AM</description><dc:date>2008-02-14T06:27:28+02:00</dc:date></item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/258">
		
		<link>http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/258</link>
		
		<title>Comment left by christopher mcilroy</title><description>I tend to use 800 so the majority can see this site as it should be!

Chris - Date posted Feb 1, 2008 07:58 PM</description><dc:date>2008-02-01T19:58:57+02:00</dc:date></item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/256">
		
		<link>http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/256</link>
		
		<title>Comment left by Web Design Company</title><description>Great! Thanks - Date posted Jan 27, 2008 11:38 PM</description><dc:date>2008-01-27T23:38:54+02:00</dc:date></item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/255">
		
		<link>http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/255</link>
		
		<title>Comment left by web design company</title><description>Greath! Thanks - Date posted Jan 25, 2008 12:55 PM</description><dc:date>2008-01-25T12:55:50+02:00</dc:date></item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/245">
		
		<link>http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/245</link>
		
		<title>Comment left by Jake</title><description>Really a great article for designers.. As for me, I guess the best size to use is 1024x768. Few people browse the internet on a 800x600 resolution. But still, it would depend on the site you are desig - Date posted Jan 10, 2008 01:12 PM</description><dc:date>2008-01-10T13:12:55+02:00</dc:date></item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/243">
		
		<link>http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/243</link>
		
		<title>Comment left by bigbluealien</title><description>The perfect design will resize for any resolution (within reason), it may take a long time to get right but there&amp;#039;s no reason your site shouldn&amp;#039;t look perfect in any of the common resolution - Date posted Jan 6, 2008 08:26 PM</description><dc:date>2008-01-06T20:26:19+02:00</dc:date></item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/242">
		
		<link>http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/242</link>
		
		<title>Comment left by Andy</title><description>Hi

Simple fix to keep all happy - use the percentage markup instead of fixed pixel width. Then it makes little or no difference if they are at 800x600, 1024x768 or higher or even lower (taking into - Date posted Jan 6, 2008 02:52 PM</description><dc:date>2008-01-06T14:52:33+02:00</dc:date></item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/241">
		
		<link>http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/241</link>
		
		<title>Comment left by Devon Website Design</title><description>We have been designing websites for 1024x768 for several years now. To keep our site as easy as possible to use for people with 800x600 resolution we try to keep our navgation towards the top left of  - Date posted Jan 6, 2008 01:29 PM</description><dc:date>2008-01-06T13:29:40+02:00</dc:date></item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/238">
		
		<link>http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/65/238</link>
		
		<title>Comment left by Gav</title><description>Great article, I&amp;#039;ll be checking for updates regularly.

Regarding screen resolutions, I seem to remember there was some controversy when alistapart.com changed to a fixed width 1024x768 resolut - Date posted Dec 24, 2007 02:56 PM</description><dc:date>2007-12-24T14:56:58+02:00</dc:date></item>

</rdf:RDF>