<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rdf:RDF xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:h="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"
	xmlns:hr="http://www.w3.org/2000/08/w3c-synd/#"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"><channel rdf:about="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog"><title>Recent Comments for .htm vs. .html</title><description>I'm often asked which is better: .htm or .html. This (extremely!) short article
discusses the differences between the two file types and which is the correct one to use.

So what's the difference and which is best?</description><link>http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/56</link><items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/56/319" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/56/317" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/56/313" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/56/305" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/56/303" /><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/56/301" /></rdf:Seq></items></channel><item rdf:about="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/56/319">
		
		<link>http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/56/319</link>
		
		<title>Comment left by Deepak</title><description>html is better..coz it is compatible with each... - Date posted Dec 20, 2008 06:35 AM</description><dc:date>2008-12-20T06:35:41+02:00</dc:date></item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/56/317">
		
		<link>http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/56/317</link>
		
		<title>Comment left by ITMDesign</title><description>I prefer .html. It seems to be used more across the Internet than .htm does so it looks a little more professional.

Programs like Microsoft Frontpage save files as .htm and that&amp;#039;s not the most - Date posted Dec 9, 2008 02:46 PM</description><dc:date>2008-12-09T14:46:58+02:00</dc:date></item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/56/313">
		
		<link>http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/56/313</link>
		
		<title>Comment left by Isabelle Newton</title><description>I agree - not a lot of difference at all apart from the default filenames scenario. - Date posted Nov 10, 2008 01:10 PM</description><dc:date>2008-11-10T13:10:30+02:00</dc:date></item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/56/305">
		
		<link>http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/56/305</link>
		
		<title>Comment left by webdesign</title><description>i have to agree on that. - Date posted Sep 10, 2008 01:54 PM</description><dc:date>2008-09-10T13:54:08+02:00</dc:date></item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/56/303">
		
		<link>http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/56/303</link>
		
		<title>Comment left by Soula Digital Design</title><description>I have to say we personally prefer html because of people typing stuff in, I know it will only be a very, very small amount of people but it&amp;#039;s better than them seeing an error page. 

I do agre - Date posted Aug 18, 2008 08:34 AM</description><dc:date>2008-08-18T08:34:09+02:00</dc:date></item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/56/301">
		
		<link>http://www.acmultimedia.co.uk/blog/article/56/301</link>
		
		<title>Comment left by hull web design</title><description>Exactly my sentiments. - Date posted Aug 8, 2008 11:41 AM</description><dc:date>2008-08-08T11:41:10+02:00</dc:date></item>

</rdf:RDF>